Organizational Innovation – A Means to Enhance Quality of Life for Employees in Knowledge Economy
Abstract
This paper provides an overview of the latest significant researches, both in academic and public institutions, both theoretical and empirical, both in Europe and worldwide, on organizational innovation. It synthesizes the different approaches especially on the effects of innovative practices on the employees’ quality of life, as they emerge from the empirical research conducted in different organizations and countries, mainly in organizations of knowledge-intensive business services sector, specific to knowledge economy. Organizational innovation is a new way of organizing the business practices of the organization, including knowledge management, in workplace organization or external relations; it refers to practices that have never been used before by the company. Knowledge-based organizations are built on intangible assets, on the knowledge, experience and competences of high-skilled human resources, who represent the most valuable resource of these organizations. The secondary data analysis we conducted showed that workplace innovation leads to employees’ welfare, health and therefore to their motivation and loyalty. Unfortunately, in the last five years, the percentage of European companies that adopt new, innovative forms of organization (“discretionary learning” forms), meant to ensure better working conditions, decreased. Moreover, in Romania there is a lack of harmonization between legislation and the development of activities specific to the knowledge economy; that is why the conclusions of the paper consist in several guidelines for Romanian business environment in order to improve the “golden collars” employees’ quality of life.References
Alvesson, M. (2004). Knowledge Work and Knowledge-Intensive Firms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Alvesson, M. (2000). Social Identity and the Problem of Loialty in Knowledge-Intensive Companies. Journal of Management Studies, 37(8), 1101-1123.
Armbruster, H., Bikfalvi, A., Kinkel, S., and Lay, G. (2008). Organizational innovation: The challenge of measuring non-technical innovation in large-scale surveys. Technovation, 28(10), 644–657.
Brătianu, C., (2013). The Triple Helix of the Organizational Knowledge. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 1(2), 207-220.
Cox, A., Rickard, C., and Tamkin, P.(2012). Work organization and innovation, Eurofound (European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions). Retrieved from www.eurofound.europa.eu/pubdocs/2012/72/en/1/EF1272EN.pdf.
Crossan, M. M., and Apaydin, M. (2010). A Multi-Dimensional Framework of Organizational Innovation: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 1154-1191.
Donaldson, L. (2001). Reflections on Knowledge and Knowledge-Intensive Firms. Human Relations, 54(7), 955-963.
European Commission. (2013). Union Innovation Scoreboard 2013. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/innovation/files/ius-2013_en.pdf.
Eurostat, OECD (2005). Oslo Manual. Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data. Retrieved from http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_PUBLIC/OSLO/EN/OSLO-EN.PDF.
Eurostat (2013). Innovation statistics, Europe in figures. Eurostat Yearbook 2013. Retrieved from http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/index.php/Innovation_statistics.
Glodeanu, I., Hoffman, O., Leovaridis. C., Nica, E., Nicolaescu, A., Popescu, G., and Rașeev, S. (2009). Noile paradigme ale inovării. Studiu de caz – Universitatea corporativă [New paradigms of innovation. Case study – the corporate university]. Bucharest: Expert Publishing House.
Hoffman, O. (1999). Management. Fundamente socioumane [Management. Socio-human foundations]. Bucharest: Victor Publishing House.
Hollanders, H., and Es-Sadki, N. (2013). Innovation Union Scoreboard 2013. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/innovation/facts-figures-analysis/innovation-scoreboard/index_en.htm.
Ichijo, K., and Kohlbacher, F. (2008). Tapping tacit local knowledge in emerging markets – the Toyota way. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 6(3), 173-186.
Israilidis, J., Lock, R., and Cooke, L. (2013). Ignorance Management. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 1(1), 71-85.
Lam, W. (2005). Successful knowledge management requires a knowledge culture: a case study. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 3(4), 206–217.
Lam, A. (2011). Organizational innovation. In J. Fagerberg, D.C.M., and R.R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation (pp.115-147). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Landry, C. (2008). The Creative City: A Toolkit for Urban Innovators. USA: Earthscan.
Lazonick, W. (2011). The Innovative Firm. In J. Fagerberg, D.C.M., and R.R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation (pp.29-55). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Leovaridis, C. (2013). Noi caracteristici ale calităţii vieţii în contextul economiei cunoaşterii şi al competiţiei pe plan european. Aspecte organizaţionale şi manageriale [New characteristics of life quality in the context of knowledge economy and of European competition. Organizational and managerial aspects]. Bucharest: Expert Publishing House.
Leovaridis, C. (2011). Organizațiile intensive-cognitive și managementul acestora. Agenția de publicitate ca organizație de acest tip [Knowledge-intensive organizations and their management. The advertising agency]. In C. Stoenescu (Ed.), Managementul cunoașterii. Teme actuale [Knowledge management. Current themes] (pp.45-76). Bucharest: Bucharest University Publishing House.
Leovaridis, C. (2008a). Organizaţiile intensiv-cognitive [Knowledge-intensive organizations]. In Cooper, C. L. and Avram, E. (Eds.), Psihologie organizațional-managerială. Tendințe actuale [Organizational-managerial psychology. Current tendencies] (pp.838-870). Iasi: Polirom Publishing House.
Leovaridis, C. (2008b). Inovaţia în organizaţiile intensiv-cognitive din sectorul serviciilor [Innovation in knowledge-intensive organizations from services sector]. In Avram, E. (Ed.), Psihologia în organizaţiile moderne [The psychology of modern organizations] (pp.257-270). Bucharest: Universitară Publishing House.
Lundvall, B.-Å. (2014). Deteriorating quality of work undermines Europe’s innovation systems and the welfare of Europe’s workers! Retrieved from http://portal.ukwon.eu/pdfs/bengt_lundvall_essay.pdf.
Lopez-Leyva, S., Castillo-Arce, M.L., Ledezma-Torres, J.D., and Rios-Flores, J.A. (2014). Economic Growth from a Theoretical Perspective of Knowledge Economy: an Empirical Analysis for Mexico. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 2(2), 217-239.
Maitland, A., and Thomson, P.(2014). Future work. Retrieved from http://portal.ukwon.eu/pdfs/Maitland%20EUWIN%20Bulletin%20%20June2014.pdf.
Makó, C., Illéssy, M., and Csizmadia, P.(2013a). Measuring Organisational Innovation – The Example of the European Community Innovation Survey. In M. Csaba, I. Polónyi, and M. Szanyi (Eds.), Organisational innovation & knowledge development. Institutions, Methodological Foundations and Empirical Experiences (pp.75-110). Budapest: New Mandate Publishing House.
Makó, C., Illéssy, M., and Csizmadia, P.(2013b). The knowledge intensive business services sector in Hungary in a comparative perspective (Hungarian vs. Slovak Business Service Firms). In M. Csaba, I. Polónyi, and M. Szanyi (Eds.), Organisational innovation & knowledge development. Institutions, Methodological Foundations and Empirical Experiences (pp.136-174). Budapest: New Mandate Publishing House.
Magnier-Watanabe, R., Benton, C., and Senoo, D. (2011). A study of knowledge management enablers across countries. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 9(1), 17-28.
National Institute of Statistics (2013). Romania Statistical Yearbook 2012. Retrieved from http://www.insse.ro/cms/files/Anuar%20statistic/13/13.Stiinta,%20tehnologie%20si%20inovare_ro.pdf.
National Institute of Statistics (2014). Comunicat de presă nr. 43/ din 14 februarie 2014. Inovarea în industrie și servicii în perioada 2010-2012. Rezultate parțiale [Press release no. 43 / 14 February 2014. Innovation in industry and services between 2010-2012. Partial results]. Retrieved from http://www.insse.ro/cms/files/statistici/comunicate/com_trim/Inov_ind/inov atia%20ind-serv2014r.pdf.
Nica, E. (2008). Psihosociologie managerială [Managerial psychosociology]. Bucharest: Economică Publishing House.
Nielsen, P., and Lundvall, B.-A. (2007). Innovation, learning organizations and employment relations. In C. Mako, H. Moerel, M. Illessy, and P.Csizmadia (Eds.), Working it out? The labour process and employment relations in the new economy (pp.65-84). Budapest: Akademiai Kiado.
Pot, F. (2011). Workplace innovation for better jobs and performance, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 60(4), 404–415.
Rickards, T. (1999). Innovation. In M.A. Runco, and S. R. Pritzker, Encyclopedia of Creativity (pp.35-45). San Diego: Academic Press.
Thite, M. (2004). Strategic Positioning of HRM in Knowledge-based Organizations. The Learning Organization, 11(1), 28-44.
Valeyre, A., Lorenz, E., Cartron, D., Csizmadia, P., Gollac, M., Illéssy, and M., Makó, C. (2009). Working conditions in the European Union: Work organization, Eurofound (European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions). Retrieved from http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/publications/htmlfiles/ef0862.htm.
Valkokari, K., Paasi, J., and Rantala, T. (2012). Managing knowledge within networked innovation. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 10(1), 27-40.
Van Treuer, K. (2006). The relationship between leadership, organisational climate and workplace innovation. Retrieved from http://researchbank.swinburne.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/swin:7765.
Vătămănescu, E.-M., Andrei, A.G., Leovaridis, C., and Dumitriu, L.-D. (2015). Exploring network-based intellectual capital as a competitive advantage. An insight into European universities from developing economies. In J.G. Cegarra Navarro (Ed.), Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Intellectual Capital ECIC 2015 (pp.350-358). Reading, UK: Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited.
Totterdill, P., Dhondt, S., and Devons, N. (2014). The Case for Workplace Innovation. Retrieved from http://portal.ukwon.eu/Case_for_workplaceinnovation.
World Bank (2011). Knowledge for Development Program. Context. Retrieved from http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/WBI/WBIPROGRAMS/KFDLP/.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) with the condition to attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor. They may not alter, transform, or build upon this work.
