Ageing and responsible consumption

Alexandra ZBUCHEA, Loredana IVAN, Rares MOCANU


Multiple studies show that the contemporary society is increasingly more responsible and ask companies to prove responsible citizens, too. The current study aims to a better understanding of the role of age plans in responsible consumption attitudes and values. Investigating the literature in the field, including studies developed worldwide as well as on the Romanian market. The research documents that the younger adults are more responsible and greener than older persons. Nevertheless, the older the consumer, the more trustful in the personal impact of her/his consumption is. The older adults seem to be less inclined towards responsible buying. The available data also suggests that the age gap is closing, and older consumers tend to be increasingly more responsible.

Full Text:



Accenture. (2014). From Marketing to Mattering. June.

Accenture. (2016 & 2019). UNGC – Accenture Strategy CEO Study on Sustainability. June 2016, September 2019.

Accenture. (2018). From Me to We: The Rise of the Purpose-led Brand, December.

Accenture. (2019). Accenture Chemicals Global Consumer Sustainability Survey 2019, June.

Accenture. (2020, November). The big value shift.

Aertsens, J., Verbeke, W., Mondelaers, M., & Van Huylenbroeck, G. (2009). Personal determinants of organic food consumption: a review. British Food Journal, 111(10), 1140-1168.

Andrei, A. G., Gazzola, P., Zbuchea, A., & Alexandru, V. A. (2017). Modeling socially responsible consumption and the need for uniqueness: A PLS-SEM approach. Kybernetes, 46(8), 1325-1340.

Balderjahn, I., Buerke, A., Kirchgeorg, M., Peyer, M., Seegebarth, B., & Wiedmann, K. P. (2013). Consciousness for sustainable consumption: scale development and new insights in the economic dimension of consumers’ sustainability. AMS Review, 3(4), 181-192.

Becker-Olsen, K.L., Cudmore, B.A., & Hill, R.P. (2006). The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on consumer behaviour. Journal of Business Research, 59(1), 46-53.

Baier, D., Rausch, T. M., & Wagner, T. F. (2020). The Drivers of Sustainable Apparel and Sportswear Consumption: A Segmented Kano Perspective. Sustainability, 12(7), 2788.

Brand, M., & Markowitsch, H. J. (2010). Aging and decision-making: a neurocognitive perspective. Gerontology, 56(3), 319-324.

Bulut, Z. A., Kökalan Çımrin, F., & Doğan, O. (2017). Gender, generation and sustainable consumption: Exploring the behaviour of consumers from Izmir, Turkey. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 41(6), 597-604.

Carpenter, S. M., & Yoon, C. (2015). Aging and consumer decision making. In T. M. Hess, J. Strough, C. E. Löckenhoff (Eds.), Aging and decision making (pp. 351-370). Academic Press.

Carr, D. J., Gotlieb, M. R., Lee, N. J., & Shah, D. V. (2012). Examining overconsumption, competitive consumption, and conscious consumption from 1994 to 2004: disentangling cohort and period effects. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 644(1), 220-233.

Carlsson‐Kanyama, A., Lindén, A. L., & Eriksson, B. (2005). Residential energy behaviour: does generation matter?. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 29(3), 239-253.

Caruana, R, & Chatzidakis, A (2014). Consumer social responsibility (CnSR): toward a multi-level, multi agent conceptualization of the ‘Other CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 121(4), 577–592.

Ciobanu, C. (2020). Comportamentul românilor față de reciclare: seniorii pensionari (84%) și familiile moderne (76%) declară că selectează deșeurile în cea mai mare măsură [Behaviour of Romanians towards recycling: retired seniors (84%) and modern families (76%) say they select waste the most]. Retail-FMCG.

Coelho, T., Chkoniya, V., Madsen, A.O., & Figueiredo, C. (2020). Leading the Way to a Sustainable Future: The Positive Impact of a Generation Marketing Campaign. In Anthropological Approaches to Understanding Consumption Patterns and Consumer Behavior (pp. 1-21). IGI Global.

Cone Communications. (2006). 2006 Millennial Cause Study.

Cone Communications. (2008). Past. Present. Future. The 25th Anniversary of Cause Marketing.

Cone Communications. (2010). 2010 Cause Evolution Study.

Cone Communications. (2013a). 2013 Cone Communications Social Impact Study.

Cone Communications. (2013b). 2013 Cone Communications/ Echo Global CSR Study.

Cone Communications. (2014a). 2014 Cone Communications Digital Activism Study.

Cone Communications. (2014b). 2014 Cone Communications Recycling in the Home Survey.

Cone Communications. (2015a). 2015 Cone Communications Millennial CSR Study.

Cone Communications. (2015b). 2015 Cone Communications/Ebiquity Global CSR Study

Cone Communications. (2017). 2017 Cone Communications CSR Study.

Cone/Porter Novelli. (2017). 2017 Cone Gen Z CSR Study: How to Speak Z.

Cone/Porter Novelli. (2018). 2018 Cone/Porter Novelli Purpose Study: How to Build Deeper Bonds, Amplify Your Message and Expand the Consumer Base.

Cone/Porter Novelli. (2019). 2019 Porter Novelli/Cone Gen Z Purpose Study

Crișan, C., Zbuchea, A., & Moraru, S. (2017). An Overview of CSR and Socially Aware Consumers: Where East Meets West. In Zbuchea, A., Brătianu, C., & Pînzaru, F. (Eds.), Economic behaviour: economy, business and people (pp. 220-252). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Degli Esposti, P., Mortara, A., & Roberti, G. (2021). Sharing and Sustainable Consumption in the Era of COVID-19. Sustainability, 13(4), 1903.

Diprose, K., Valentine, G., Vanderbeck, R. M., Liu, C., & McQuaid, K. (2019). Building common cause towards sustainable consumption: A cross-generational perspective. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 2(2), 203-228.

Eberhart, A. K., & Naderer, G. (2017). Quantitative and qualitative insights into consumers’ sustainable purchasing behaviour: A segmentation approach based on motives and heuristic cues. Journal of Marketing Management, 33(13-14), 1149-1169.

Forkert, K. (2014). The new moralism: austerity, silencing and debt morality. Soundings, 56(56), 41-53.

Fotopoulos, C., & Krystallis, A. (2002). Purchasing motives and profile of the Greek organic consumer: a countrywide survey. British Food Journal, 104(9), 730-765.

Galati, A., Schifani, G., Crescimanno, M., & Migliore, G. (2019). “Natural wine” consumers and interest in label information: An analysis of willingness to pay in a new Italian wine market segment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 227, 405-413.

Getzner, M., & Grabner-Krauter, S. (2004). Consumer preferences and marketing strategies for “green shares”: Specifics of the Austrian market. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 22, 260-278.

Green, B. N. (2006). Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: Secrets of the trade. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 5(3), 101–117.

Groening, C., Sarkis, J., & Zhu, Q. (2018). Green marketing consumer-level theory review: A compendium of applied theories and further research directions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 1848-1866.

Han, T. I., & Stoel, L. (2017). Explaining socially responsible consumer behaviour: A meta-analytic review of theory of planned behaviour. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 29(2), 91-103.

He, H., & Harris, L. (2020). The impact of Covid-19 pandemic on corporate social responsibility and marketing philosophy. Journal of Business Research, 116, 176-182.

Heo, J., & Muralidharan, S. (2019). What triggers young Millennials to purchase eco-friendly products?: the interrelationships among knowledge, perceived consumer effectiveness, and environmental concern. Journal of Marketing Communications, 25(4), 421-437.

Hughner, R. S., McDonagh, P., Prothero, A., Shultz, C. J., & Stanton, J. (2007). Who are organic food consumers? A compilation and review of why people purchase organic food. Journal of Consumer Behaviour: An International Research Review, 6(2‐3), 94-110.

Hutchins, R.K., & Greenhalg, L.A. (1997). Organic confusion: Sustaining competitive advantage. British Food Journal, 99(9), 336-348.

Hwang, J., & Griffiths, M. A. (2017). Share more, drive less: Millennials value perception and behavioural intent in using collaborative consumption services. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 34(2), 132-146.

Inglehart R (2008) Changing values among Western publics from 1970 to 2006. West European Politics, 31(1-2), 130-146.

Ivan, L. (2017). Gender Differences in Investing and Savings Behaviour: The Nesting Effect. In Zbuchea, A. Bratianu, C, Pinzaru, F. (Eds). Economic Behaviour: Economy, Business and People (pp. 201-219). Cambridge University Scholars.

Ivan, L., & Fernández-Ardèvol, M. (2017). Older people, mobile communication and risks. Societies, 7(2), 7.

Kim, G., & Jin, B. E. (2019). Older female consumers’ environmentally sustainable apparel consumption. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 4, 487-503.

Kohlbacher, F., & Herstatt, C. (2011). The silver market phenomenon: Business opportunities in an era of demographic change. Springer.

Lee, K. H., & Shin, D. (2010). Consumers’ responses to CSR activities: The linkage between increased awareness and purchase intention. Public Relations Review, 36(2), 193-195.

Lindenberg, S., & Steg, L. (2007). Normative, gain and hedonic goal frames guiding environmental behaviour. Journal of Social Issues, 63(1), 117-137.

Maslow, A. H. (1999). Toward a psychology of being (3rd edition). John Wiley.

Massey, M., O'Cass, A., & Otahal, P. (2018). A meta-analytic study of the factors driving the purchase of organic food. Appetite, 125, 418-427.

Mohr, L. A., Webb, D. J., & Harris, K. E. (2001). Do consumers expect companies to be socially responsible? The impact of corporate social responsibility on buying behaviour. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 35(1), 45-72.

Moschis, G. P. (2012). Consumer behaviour in later life: Current knowledge, issues, and new directions for research. Psychology & Marketing, 29(2), 57-75.

Nielsen. (2012, March). The Global, Socially-Conscious Consumer.

Nielsen. (2013, August). Consumers Who Care and Say They’ll Reward Companies with Their Wallet.

Nielsen. (2014, June). Doing Well by Doing Good. Increasingly, Consumers Care about Corporate Social Responsibility, but Does Concern Convert to Consumption?.

Nielsen. (2015, October). The Sustainability Imperative. New Insights on Consumer Expectations.

Nielsen. (2018, November). Consumers Buy The Change They Wish To See in The World. /

Nielsen. (2020, April). A look at how home care product claim preferences have shifted amid the COVID-19 pandemic.

Nielsen. (2021, February). Unlocking consumption: four consumer groups driving spend.

Paul, J., & Rana, J. (2012). Consumer behaviour and purchase intention for organic food. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 29(6), 412–422.

Phipps, M., et al. (2013). Understanding the inherent complexity of sustainable consumption: A social cognitive framework. Journal of Business Research, 66(8), 1227-1234.

Pinto, D.C., Nique, W.M., Añaña, E.D.S., & Herter, M.M. (2011). Green consumer values: how do personal values influence environmentally responsible water consumption?. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 35(2), 122-131.

Rees Jones, I., & Hyde, M. (2008). Ageing in a consumer society: From passive to active consumption in Britain. Policy Press.

Roberts, J. A. (1995). Profiling levels of socially responsible consumer behaviour: a cluster analytic approach and its implications for marketing. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 3(4), 97-117.

Schäfer, M., Jaeger-Erben, M., & Bamberg, S. (2012). Life events as windows of opportunity for changing towards sustainable consumption patterns?. Journal of Consumer Policy, 35(1), 65-84.

Schmitz, J. & Schrader, J. (2015). Corporate Social Responsibility: A Microeconomic Review of the Literature. Journal of Economic Surveys, 29(1), 27-45.

Seifi, S., Zulkifli, N., Yusuff, R., & Sullaiman, S. (2012). Information requirements for sustainable consumption. Social Responsibility Journal, 8(3), 433-441.

Şener, A., & Hazer, O. (2008). Values and sustainable consumption behaviour of women: a Turkish sample. Sustainable Development, 16(5), 291-300.

Servaes, H., & Tamayo, A. (2013). The impact of corporate social responsibility on firm value: The role of customer awareness. Management Science, 59(5), 1045-1061.

Straughan, R. D., & Roberts, J. A. (1999). Environmental segmentation alternatives: a look at green consumer behaviour in the new millennium. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 16(6), 558-575.

Tandon, A., Jabeen, F., Talwar, S., Sakashita, M., & Dhir, A. (2021). Facilitators and inhibitors of organic food buying behaviour. Food Quality and Preference, 88, 104077.

Thøgersen, J. (2010). Country differences in sustainable consumption: The case of organic food. Journal of Macromarketing, 30(2), 171-185.

Urien, B., & Kilbourne, W. (2011). Generativity and self‐enhancement values in eco‐friendly behavioural intentions and environmentally responsible consumption behavior. Psychology & Marketing, 28(1), 69-90.

Valaskova, K., Durana, P., & Adamko, P. (2021). Changes in consumers’ purchase patterns as a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic. Mathematics, 9(15), 1788.

Vázquez-Carrasco, R., & López-Pérez, M.E. (2013). Small & medium-sized enterprises and Corporate Social Responsibility: a systematic review of the literature. Quality & Quantity, 47(6), 3205-3218.

Worner, F., & Meier-Ploegger, A. (1999). What the consumer says. Ecology and Farming, 20. 14-15.

Zalega, T. (2018). Sustainable consumption in consumer behaviour of Polish seniors (report from own research). Acta Scientiarum Polonorum. Oeconomia, 17(1), 131-139.

Zbuchea, A. (2013). Are Customers Rewarding Responsible Businesses? An Overview of the Theory and Research in the Field of CSR. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 1(3), 367-385.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2021 Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© Faculty of Management (SNSPA)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under CC BY-NC

The opinions expressed in the papers published are the authors’ own and do not necessarily express the views of the editors of this journal. The authors assume all responsibility for the ideas expressed in the materials published.

ISSN 2392-8042 (online)