Sovereign Default Analysis through Extreme Events Identification

Vasile George MARICA, Lucian Claudiu ANGHEL

Abstract


This paper investigates contagion in international credit markets through the use of a novel jump detection technique proposed by Chan and Maheuin (2002). This econometrical methodology is preferred because it is non-linear by definition and not a subject to volatility bias. Also, the identified jumps in CDS premiums are considered as outliers positioned beyond any stochastic movement that can and is already modelled through well-known linear analysis. Though contagion is hard to define, we show that extreme discrete movements in default probabilities inferred from CDS premiums can lead to sound economic conclusions about the risk profile of sovereign nations in international bond markets. We find evidence of investor sentiment clustering for countries with unstable political regimes or that are engaged in armed conflict. Countries that have in their recent history faced currency or financial crises are less vulnerable to external unexpected shocks. First we present a brief history of sovereign defaults with an emphasis on their increased frequency and geographical reach, as financial markets become more and more integrated. We then pass to a literature review of the most important definitions for contagion, and discuss what quantitative methods are available to detect the presence of contagion. The paper continues with the details for the methodology of jump detection through non-linear modelling and its use in the field of contagion identification. In the last sections we present the estimation results for simultaneous jumps between emerging markets CDS and draw conclusions on the difference of behavior in times of extreme movement versus tranquil periods.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adam, C.S., and Bevan, D.L. (2005). Fiscal deficits and growth in developing countries. Journal of Public Economics, 89(4), 571-597.

Aizenman, J., KKletzer, K., and Pinto, B. (2007). Economic growth with constraints on tax revenues and public debt: implications for fiscal policy and cross-country differences. NBER WP 12750. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Andersen, T.G., Dobrev, D., and Schamburg, E. (2012). Jump-robust volatility estimation using nearest neighbor truncation. Journal of Econometrics, 169(1), 75-93.

Barndorff-Nielsen, O.E., Shephard, N., and Winkel, M. (2006). Limit theorems for multipower variation in the presence of jumps. Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 116(5), 796-806.

Bekaert, G., and Harvey, C. R. (2003). Market integration and contagion. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Bisignano, J.R., Hunter, W.C., and Kaufman, G.G. (2000). Global financial crises: lessons from recent events. Boston, Dordrecht and London: Kluwer Academic.

Blanchard, O. J. (1984). Debt, deficits and finite horizons. The Journal of Political Economy, 93(2), 223-247.

Chan, W., and Maheu, J. (2002). Conditional jump dynamics in stock market returns. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 20(3), 377-389.

Didier, T., Mauro, P., and Schmukler, S.L. (2008). Vanishing financial contagion? Journal of Policy Modeling, 30(5), 775-791.

Fogel, R. (2010). $123,000,000,000,000. Foreign Policy, January/February, 70-75.

Forbes, K.J., and Rigobon, R. (2002). No contagion, only interdependence: measuring stock market comovements. The journal of Finance, 57(5), 2223-2261.

Jorion, P. (1988). On jump processes in the foreign exchange and stock markets. Review of Financial Studies, 1(4), 427-445.

Kaminsky, G.L., Reinhart, C., and Vegh, C. (2003). The unholy trinity of financial contagion. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Krugman, P. (1988). Financing vs. forgiving a debt overhang. Journal of development Economics, 29(3), 253–268.

Lee, S.S., and Mykland, P.A. (2008). Jumps in financial markets: A new nonparametric test and jump dynamics. Review of Financial studies, 21(6), 2535-2563.

Lindert, P.H., and Morton, P.J. (1989). How sovereign debt has worked in Developing Country Debt and Economic Performance. In J. Sachs (Ed.). Developing Country Debt and Economic Performance (pp. 39-106). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Merton, R. (1976). Option pricing when underlying stock returns are discontinuous. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(1-2), 125-144.

Mihalcea, A.D., and Vițelar, A. (2014). The European Union and International Governance: Still on the Path to a Global Power?. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 2(3), 537-549.

Pericoli, M., and Sbracia, M. (2003). A primer on financial contagion. Journal of Economic Surveys, 17(4), 571-608.

Press, S.J. (1967). A compound events model for security prices. Journal of business, 40(3), 317-335.

Reinhart, C.M., Rogoff, K.S., and Savastano, M.A. (2003). Debt intolerance, w9908. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Reinhart, C., and Rogoff, K. (2009). This time is different: eight centuries of financial folly. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Saint-Paul, G. (1992). Fiscal policy in an endogenous growth model. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(4), 1243-1259.

Sturzenegger, F., and Zettelmeyer, J. (2006). Debt defaults and lessons from a decade of crises. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.

Suter, C., and Stamm, H. (1992). Coping with global debt crises: debt settlements, 1820 to 1986. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 34(4), 645-678.

Treapăt, L.M. (2011). The Management and the Assurance of the Banking Risks in Romania. Bucharest: Economica Publishing House.

Winkler, M. (1933). Foreign Bonds: An Autopsy; a Study of Defaults and Repudiations of Government Obligations. Philadelphia: Roland Swain Company.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2015 Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© Faculty of Management (SNSPA)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under CC BY-NC

The opinions expressed in the papers published are the authors’ own and do not necessarily express the views of the editors of this journal. The authors assume all responsibility for the ideas expressed in the materials published.

ISSN 2392-8042 (online)