The Use of the Evidence from the Behavioral Sciences in the Organizational Decision-Making Process



The important managerial decision-making and the development of policies, strategies, internal normative acts and procedures must be solid grounded for efficient achieving of their objectives. To this end, the evidence-based approach uses various types of evidence, a leading role having those scientific, and the critical thinking. The evidence from behavioral sciences is especially important when the decisions objectives involve behavioral elements. They also help to ensure the rationality of any decision-making process. The concern for the use of behavioral sciences research in the decision-making preceded the occurrence of evidence-based approach. The increased knowledge fund of organizations, the access to the best practices and to the relevant scientific research findings represent only the initial stages of the evidence-based approach implementation and functioning. The ensuring of their effective use calls for special skills training among staff, the creation of tools and organizational mechanisms and of a facilitating organizational culture. This paper argues the need to integrate two approaches that promote the decision-making based on scientific evidence, the evidence-based approach and the use of behavioral and social sciences in the decision-making, to potentiate the contribution of the behavioral sciences to the increasing of the decision-making efficiency. The efforts made in this paper had overall objective to prepare and facilitate the use of research evidence provided by behavioral sciences in the organizational decision-making process by presenting the main concepts and knowledge in the field and by proposing an outline procedure specifically developed.

Full Text:



Allen, D.G., Bryant, P.C., and Vardaman, J.M. (2010). Retaining Talent: Replacing misconceptions with evidence-based strategies. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(2), 48-64.

Barends, E., Rousseau, D.M., and Briner, R.B. (2014). Evidence-based management. The basic principles. Amsterdam: Centre for Evidence-Based Management. Retrieved from

The Behavioural Insights Team (n.d.). What are behavioural insights?. Retrieved from

Crime and Justice Institute at Community Resources for Justice (2009). Implementing Evidence-Based Policy and Practice in Community Corrections (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: National Institute of Corrections.

Directorate General for Research of European Comission - Socio-economic Sciences and Humanities (2010). Communicating research for evidence-based Policymaking - A practical guide for researchers in socio-economic sciences and humanities. Retrieved from

Dolan, P., Hallsworth, M., Halpern, D., King, D., and Vlaev, I. (2010). MINDSPACE: Influencing behaviour through public policy. UK: Institute for Government and Cabinet Office.

Downes, S. (1995). Causal fallacies. Retrieved from

Downes, S. (1996). Fallacies of explanation. Retrieved from

Dror, Y. (1969). A general systems approach to uses of behavioral sciences for better policymaking. Retrieved from

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Strauss, Giroux.

Kahneman, D., Lovallo, D., and Sibony, O (2011). The Big Idea: Before You Make That Big Decision. Harvard Business Review, 89(6), 50-60.

Kmet, L.M., Lee, R.C., and Cook, L. (2004). Standard quality assessment criteria for evaluating primary research papers from a variety of fields. Alberta, Canada: Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research.

Lum, C., Koper, C.S., and Telep, C.W. (2010). Evidence-Based Policing Matrix. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7(1), 3-26.

Madhavan, R., and Mahoney, J. T. (2011). Evidence−Based Management in "Macro" Areas: The Case of Strategic Management. Retrieved from edu /Working_Papers/papers/11−0105.pdf.

Maxim, P.S., Garis, L., and Plecass, D. (2013). The right decision. Evidence-based decision making for fire service professionals. Retrieved from

Prewitt, K., Schwandt, T.A., and Straf, M.L. (2012). Using Science as Evidence in Public Policy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

Oster, C.A. (2011). Guiding principles for evidence-based practice. In J. Houser and K. Oman (Eds.), Evidence based practice: An implementation guide for healthcare organizations (pp. 83-109). Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.

Pfeffer, J., and Sutton, R.I. (2006). Evidence based-management. Harward Bussines Review, 84(1), 62-74.

Potworowski, G., and Green, L.A. (2012). Culture and evidence-based management. In D.M. Rousseau (Ed.). Handbook of evidence-based management: Companies, classrooms, and research (pp. 272–292). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Prewitt, K., and Hauser, R. (2013). Applying the Social and Behavioral Sciences to Policy and Practice. Issues in Science and Technology, 29(3), 53-57.

Rousseau, D.M. (2012a). The Oxford handbook of evidence–based management. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.

Rousseau, D.M. (2012b). Organizational Behavior’s Contributions to Evidence-Based Management. In D.M. Rousseau (Ed.). The Oxford handbook of evidence–based management (pp. 185-240). Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.

Rousseau, D.M. (2012c). Envisioning Evidence-Based Management. In D.M. Rousseau (Ed.). The Oxford handbook of evidence–based management (pp. 185-240). Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.

Rousseau, D.M., and Mccarthy, S. (2007). Educating Managers from an Evidence-Based Perspective. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 6(1), 84–101.

Rousseau, D.M. (2006). Is there such a thing as “evidence based management”?. Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 256–269.

Rousseau, D.M., and Barends, E. (2011). Becoming an evidence-based HR practitioner. Human Resource Management Journal, 21(3), 221–235.

Rynes, S.L., Brown, K.G., and Colbert, A.E. (2002). Seven common misconceptions about human resources practices: Research findings versus practitioner beliefs. Academy of Management Executive, 16(3), 92–102.

Sherman, L.W., and Gottfredson, D. (1997). Appendix: research methods. In L.W. Sherman, D.C., Gottfredson, D.L., MacKenzie, J., Eck, P., Reuter, and S.D., Bushway (Eds.), Preventing Crime: What Works, What Doesn’t, What’s Promising. Retrieved from

Segone, M. (2008). Evidence-based policy making and the role of monitoring and evaluation within the new aid environment. In M. Segone (Ed.). Bridging the gap - The role of monitoring and evaluation in evidence-based policy making. Retrieved from

Sherman, L.W., Gottfredson, D.C., MacKenzie, D.L., Eck, J., Reuter, P., and Bushway, S.D. (1998). Preventing Crime: What Works, What Doesn’t, What’s Promising. Retrieved from

Squires, J.E., Hayduk, L., Hutchinson, A.H., Cranley, L.A., Gierl, M., Cummings, G.G. et al. (2013). A Protocol for Advanced Psychometric Assessment of Surveys. Nursing Research and Practice, 2013. Retrieved from

Terpstra, E., and Limpaphayom, W. (2012). Using evidence-based human resource practices for global competitiveness. International Journal of Business and Management, 7(12), 107-113.

Thigpen, M.L., Beauclair, T.J., Keiser, G.M., and Banks, C. (2011). Evidence-Based Policy, Practice, and Decision-making. Implications for Paroling Authorities. Retrieved from

Van Bavel, R., Herrmann, B., Esposito, G., and Proestakis, A. (2013). Applying Behavioural Sciences to EU Policy-making. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

Yates, J.F., and Potworowski, G.A. (2012). Evidence-Based Decision Management. In D.M. Rousseau (Ed.). The Oxford handbook of evidence–based management (pp. 716-790). Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.

Wallis, L. (2012). Barriers to implementing evidence-based practice remain high for U.S. nurses: getting past "we've always done it this way" is crucial. American Journal of Nursing, 112(12), 15.

Wilke, A., and Mata, R. (2012). Cognitive bias. In V.S. Ramachandran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior: Vol. 1. A-D (2nd ed.) (pp. 531-535). London: Academic Press.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2015 Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© Faculty of Management (SNSPA)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under CC BY-NC

The opinions expressed in the papers published are the authors’ own and do not necessarily express the views of the editors of this journal. The authors assume all responsibility for the ideas expressed in the materials published.

ISSN 2392-8042 (online)