Methodological basis of the comparative evaluation of inclusiveness level of economic development

Alovsat Garaja ALIYEV

Abstract


The article is devoted to the methodological basis of comparative assessment of the level of inclusion of economic development in different areas and regions. The article focuses on the methodological problems of analyzing, evaluating, and raising the level of inclusiveness of economic development. The importance of raising the level of inclusion in the context of new development trends in society and the economy is interpreted. The need for a new look at the scientific and theoretical basics of economic development are emphasized. Available studies on inclusive development issues are analyzed. Indicators and sub-indices characterizing the inclusive development of the society are proposed. An analysis of international scientific research on the problems of inclusive development was conducted. As the increase in the inclusion of the economy leads to an increase in the Gross Domestic Product (GDP), the urgency of developing its prospects is justified. Ratings of advanced countries on inclusive economic development indices were analyzed. Indicators of inclusive development of international economic organizations have been identified and based on them, relevant improvements have been made and additions have been made. Indicators and sub-indices characterizing the inclusive development of society are offered. The evaluation of inclusive development at the international level is analyzed. The methodological basis of the evaluation of the inclusiveness level is explained and a technique is developed. Key efficiency indicators for inclusive growth and development have been identified. The country's National Inclusive Development Index (NII) is proposed as a dependency on sub-indices that reflect several areas. Subindices and indicators forming the level of inclusion of national economic development have been proposed. The scientific-methodological approach proposed for the assessment of inclusion at the national level is presented in the form of algorithms and conceptual stages. Assessment of the level of national inclusion is offered as Level I - inclusion at the national, social, or macro-level; Level II - inclusion of regional or individual cities and regions; Level III - intersectoral or sectorial inclusion; Level IV - inclusion in the private sector, non-governmental structures; Level V - inclusion in non-governmental and public administration; Level VI - inclusion in the micro or enterprises, production level; Level VII - in several sub-levels as individual inclusion in homes and families. National and international evaluation of the inclusive society and economic development is studied. The main factors of inclusive development of Azerbaijan's economy such as GDP per capita, labor productivity, expected healthy life length, employment level, Gini index of income, poverty level, Gini index of wealth, monthly household income, net savings, carbon capacity, public debt to GDP indicators such as ratio, demographic load ratio have been developed. The importance of the use of inclusion technologies was highlighted and reported on. It was noted that the effective platform for increasing the inclusion of the information society has many opportunities. It was noted that the globally implemented "Internet of Things" (IoT), Cloud computing, soft-computing, Big Data technologies, and components of the 4.0 Industrial Revolution will create additional opportunities for joint effective activities of citizens in society, increasing the level of inclusion.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aliyev, A. G. (2018). Problems of ICT and its security in increasing the level of inclusion of economic development. In Proceedings of the IV Republican Conference "Actual multidisciplinary scientific-practical problems of information security". Baku, 14 December (pp. 185-189).

Aliyev, A. G. (2019). Development of the indicators system for the assessment of the inclusive development level of information economy. The 13th IEEE International Conference Application of Information and Communication Technologies (AICT-2019). Baku, Azerbaijan, 23-25 October 2019 (pp. 276-279).

Andersen, A., Dahl, A., & Dannemand, P. (2017). Foresighting for inclusive development. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 119, 227-236.

Aoyama, Y., & Parthasarathy, B. (2018). When both the state and market fail: inclusive development and social innovation in India. Area Development and Policy, 3(3), 330-348.

Asongu, S. & Asongu, N. (2018). The comparative exploration of mobile money services in inclusive development. International Journal of Social Economics, 45(1), 124-139. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-08-2016-0221

Bogolib, T. (2016). Ensuring smart, sustainable, inclusive development of the regions of Ukraine in the conditions of structural crisis. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 2,(3), 10-16.

Boon-Kwee Ng., Kanagasundram, T., Wong & Chan-Yuan et al. (2016). Innovation for inclusive development in Southeast Asia: the roles of regional coordination mechanisms. Pacific Review, 29(4), 573-602. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2015.1022590

Börner, K., Rouse, W. B., Trunfio, P., & Stanley, H. E. (2018). Forecasting innovations in science, technology, and education. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(50), 12573-12581. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1818750115

Caizhi S., Ling, L., & Yanting, T. (2018). Measuring the inclusive growth of China’s coastal regions. Sustainability, 10, 2863. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082863

Cherkasov, V. V., & Zhdanov, D. A. (2018). Inclusive development of Russia: Factors of industrial growth. Economic Sciences, 7(164), 35-40.

Cichowicz, E. & Rollnik-Sadowska, E. (2018). Inclusive growth in CEE countries as a determinant of sustainable development. Sustainability, 10, 3973. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10113973

Daniels, C. U., Ustyuzhantseva, O., & Yao, W. (2017). Innovation for inclusive development, public policy support and triple helix: perspectives from BRICS. African Journal of Science Technology Innovation & Development, 9(5), 513-527.

Erbiao, D. (2016), China's inclusive development strategy and its effect on regional disparity. Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, 14(3), 263-278.

Gupta, J., & Pouw, N. (2017). Towards a trans-disciplinary conceptualization of inclusive development. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 24, 96-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.03.004

Gupta, J., & Vegelin, C. (2016). Sustainable development goals and inclusive development. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 16(3), 433-448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-016-9323-z

Haugen, H. M. (2018). Social struggle - for inclusive development and avoiding violent conflict?. Forum for Development Studies, 45(1), 143-165.

International Monetary Fund (IMF). https://www.imf.org/external/index.htm

Jonasson, C., Lauring, J., & Guttormsen D.S.A. (2018). Inclusive management in international organizations: How does it affect local and expatriate academics?. Personnel Review, 47(2), 458-473.

Kartseva, V. V., & Remnova, L. M. (2017). Conceptual bases of financial controlling in the Ukrainian system of consumer cooperatives in the context of the inclusive development paradigm. Scientific Bulletin of Polissia, 2/3(11), 113-118.

Meskhi, B., Ponomareva, S., & Ugnich, E. (2019). E-learning in higher inclusive education: needs, opportunities and limitations. International Journal of Educational Management, 33(3), 424-437. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-09-2018-0282

Pouw, N. R., & De Bruijne, A. (2015). Strategic governance for inclusive development. The European Journal of Development Research, 27(4), 481-487. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejdr.2015.53

Pouw, N. & Gupta J. (2017). Inclusive development: a multi-disciplinary approach. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 24, 104-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2016.11.013

Presidency of the Republic of Azerbaijan (2012, December 29). Development Concept “Azerbaijan-2020: Outlook for the Future” Baku. https://president.az/files/future_en.pdf

Presidency of the Republic of Azerbaijan (2014, April 2). National Strategy for the development of Information Society in the Republic of Azerbaijan for 2014-2020. https://president.az/articles/11312

Pyke, F. (2018). Managing technological change for inclusive growth. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 42(6), 1687-1695. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bey023

Sharafutdinov, R., et al. (2018). Inclusive development index in Russia: analysis, methods, possibility of application. National Academy of Managerial Staff of Culture and Arts Herald, 2, pp.1-4. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/globalpartnerships/

Simakova, L. D., & Kazimirsky, M. (2018). Economic resilience of the big G20 countries and inclusive growth. Innovations and Investments, 6, 94-97.

Songping, Z., & Azhong, Ye. (2018). Does foreign direct investment improve inclusive green growth? Empirical evidence from China. Economies, 6, 44. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies6030044

The Inclusive Development Index 2018. World economic forum-2018. https://www.weforum.org/events/world-economic-forum-annual-meeting-2018/?tab=LiveBlogs&stream=day-before-davos&stream-item=inclusive-development-index-2018

World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© Faculty of Management (SNSPA)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under CC BY-NC

The opinions expressed in the papers published are the authors’ own and do not necessarily express the views of the editors of this journal. The authors assume all responsibility for the ideas expressed in the materials published.

ISSN 2392-8042 (online)