Main Economic Policies in order to Manage an Optimum Accession of Romania to the Euro Zone


  • Lucian ANGHEL National University of Political Studies and Public Administration
  • Laurențiu-Mihai TREAPĂT National University of Political Studies and Public Administration


The present paper aims at analysing several options concerning the economic policies Romania should adopt in the following years, in order to attenuate the long term vulnerabilities within the process of joining to the Euro zone, with the observation that, the economic policies proposed in the current work were selected mainly based on the decisive factors for the real equilibrium exchange rate in Romania. Fulfilling the nominal criteria for adhesion can prove itself to be more facile but not able to ensure, on a long term and in a sustainable manner, reaching an optimum for the economy that adheres irreversibly to the Euro zone. It is important to analyze how the competitiveness of other economies evolved prior and after joining the Euro zone, from the perspective of identifying some economic policies meant to ensure the accomplishment of the real convergence criteria to the Euro zone for Romania’s case, on a long term. The economic policies proposed by the authors try to help covering the greatest delays for Romania in comparison with other states in the Euro zone and which, unsolved, can create in time significant vulnerabilities on a long term, having a negative impact for many generations of Romanians from now on.

Author Biography

Lucian ANGHEL, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration

College of Management, NUPSPA, 6 Povernei St., Sector 1, 010643, Bucharest, Romania


Adam, T. (2012). Models of Equilibrium Exchange Rates used at the CNB. CompNet Workshop, ECB. Retrieved from 2012_04_02_ECB_general.pdf?d7a97e7167a572b40ae2103b18a4df9b.

Alberola, E. (2003). Real Convergence, External Disequilibria and Equilibrium Exchange Rates in EU Acceding Countries. Madrid: Bank of Spain.

Allard, C. (2009). Competitiveness in Central-Europe: What Has Happened Since EU Accession? IMF Working Paper WP/09/121.

Alonso-Gamo, P., Fabrizio, S., Kramarenko, V., and Wang, Q. (2002). Lithuania: History and Future of the Currency Board Arrangement. IMF Working Paper 02/127.

Altăr, M., Albu, L.L., Dumitru, I., and Necula, C. (2009). The Estimation of the Real

Equilibrium Exchange Rate and of the Deviations for Romania. National Institute of Economic Research, Economics Studies 090706.

Anghel, L.C., (2013). Economia pe intelesul tuturor [Economics for All]. Bucharest. Tritonic.

Anghel, L.C., Ciurila, N., and Bojesteanu, E. (2012). Rata de schimb de echilibru și factorii săi. Cazul României [The Equilibrium Exchange Rate and Its Factors. Romania’s Case]. Bucharest: Economică Publishing House.

Anghel, L.C., Pînzaru, F.M., and Dinu, M. (2014). Aspects regarding the evolution of nominal and real convergence before and after adhesion to euro zone. In Roman, A., and Anton, S. G. (Eds.), Monetary, Banking and Financial Issues in Central and Eastern EU Member Countries: How can Central and Eastern EU Members Overcome the Current Economic Crisis? (II) (pp.40-48). Iași: “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University Publishing House.

Anghel, L.C. Pînzaru, F.M., and Dinu, M. (2014). Aspects of price competitiveness in the contexts of preparing for accession to the Euro Zone. New challenges for entrepreneurs. Romania’s case. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 2(3), 525-536.

Anghel, L.C., Pînzaru, F.M., and Treapăt, L. (2014). The evaluation of the equilibrium exchange rate based on the purchase power, for Romania’s case. University of Economic Studies of Craiova, Finance. Challenges of the Future XIV(16), 124-130.

Anghel, L., Pînzaru F.M., Dinu, M., and Treapăt, L.M. (2014). Fixing the Central Parity and the Evolution of the Currency within the Exchange Rate Mechanism II in the Countries that Joined the Euro Zone, Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 2(1), 21-40.

Anghel, L.C., and Dinu, M. (2014). Globalizarea afacerilor [Business Globalisation]. Bucharest: Tritonic.

Anghel, L.C., Ciurila, N., and Bojesteanu, E. (2012). The Equilibrium Exchange Rate and Its Factors. Romania’s Case. Retrieved from Anghel.ppt.

Babecky, J., Bulir, A., and Smidkova, K. (2010). Sustainable Real Exchange Rates in the New EU Member States: What did the Great Recession Change?. IMF Working Papers, no. 198.

Balassa, B. (1964). The Purchasing Power Parity Doctrine: A Reappraisal. Journal of Political Economy, 72(6), 584-596.

Banka Slovenije, Vlada Republike Slovenije (2003). Programme for ERM II Entry and Adoption of the Euro: Joint Report of the Slovenian government and the Bank of Slovenia. Retrieved from

Begg, D., Halpern, L., and Wyplosz, Ch. (1999). Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies, EMU and Central and Eastern Europe. Forum Report on the Economic Policy Initiative 5. London: CEPR and New York, Prague: EastWest Institute.

Beguna, A. (2002). Competitiveness and the Equilibrium Exchange Rate in Latvia. EuroFaculty Working Paper in Economics 16. August. Riga: University of Latvia and EuroFaculty.

Benkovskis, K., and Wortz, J. (2012). Evaluation of Non-Price Competitiveness of Exports from Central, Eastern and South-Eastern Countries in the EU market. Bank of Latvia Working Paper.

Beza-Bojanowska, J., and MacDonald, R. (2009). The Behavioral Zloty/ Euro Equilibrium Exchange Rate. National Bank of Poland Working Paper 55.

Bitans, M. (2002). Real Exchange Rate in Latvia: 1994–2001. Latvijas Banka Working Paper.

Bitans, M. and Tillers, I. (2003). Estimates of Equilibrium Exchange Rate in Latvia. Latvijas Banka. Analysis of the Real Exchange Rate in Latvia: 1994–2001. Latvijas Banka. Mimeo.

Bojeşteanu, E. (2010). Relaţii Monetar-Financiare Internaţionale [International Monetary and Financial Relations]. Bucharest: ASE Publishing House.

Bojeşteanu, E., Iordache, Ş., Leonte, A., and Manu, A. S. (2012). Ajustarea dezechilibrului extern în economiile emergente. Este experienţa României diferită? [The adjustment of external disequilibrium in emergent economies. Is the experience of Romania different?]. Colocviile BNR de Politică Monetară. Elemente ale cadrului de analiză şi prognoză al politicii monetare [The Monetary Politics Colloquies of NBR. Elements of analysis and prognosis of the monetary politics], Vth edition.

Buldorini, L., Makrydakis, S., and Thimann, C. (2002). The effective exchange rates of the euro. European Central Bank Occasional Paper Series no. 2.

Bulir, A., and Smidkova, K. (2005). Exchange rates in the New EU accession countries: What have we learned from the forerunners? Economic Systems 29(2), 163-186.

Burgess, R., Fabrizio, S., and Xiao, Y. (2003). Competitiveness in the Baltics in the Run-Up to EU Accession. IMF Country Report No. 114.

Ca’Zorzi, M., Chudik, A., and Dieppe, A. (2009). Current account benchmarks for Central and Eastern Europe. A desperate search? ECB Working Paper no. 995.

Central Bank of Malta (2006). A Study of the Equilibrium Real Exchange Rate of the Maltese Lira. Retrieved from: %20Equilibrium%20Real%20Exchange.pdf.

Clark, P., and MacDonald, R. (1998). Exchange Rates and Economic Fundamentals: A Methodological Comparison of BEERs and FEERs. IMF Working Paper No. 67.

Codirlaşu, A., and Chideşciuc, A. N. (2004). Estimarea efectului Balassa-Samuelson în România [Estimating the “Balassa-Samuelson” Effect in Romania. Paper presented during the conference Young Economists organized by NBR, 2004].

European Comision (2012). Scoreboard for the surveillance of macroeconomic imbalances. Occasional Papers no. 92.

Coricelli, F., and Jazbec, B. (2001). Real Exchange Rate Dynamics in Transition Economies. CEPR Discussion Papers Series, No. 2869.

Csajbók, A. (2003). The Equilibrium Real Exchange Rate in Hungary: Results from

Alternative Approaches.Paper presented at the 2nd Workshop on Macroecomic Policy Research, Magyar Nemzeti Bank.

Darvas, Zs. (2001). Exchange Rate Pass-Through and Real Exchange Rate in EU Candidate Countries. Economic Research Centre of the Deutsche Bundesbank Discussion Paper No. 10.

De Broeck, M., and Sløk, T. (2001). Interpreting Real Exchange Rate Movements in Transition Countries. IMF Working Papers, no. 56.

Dumitru, I., (2008). The Balassa-Samuelson effect in Romania-The Role of the Regulated Prices. MPRA Working Paper, no. 18611.

Egert, B., Drine, I., Lommatzsch, K., and Rault, C. (2002). The Balassa-Samuelson effect in Central and Eastern Europe: Myth or reality?. William Davidson Institute Working Paper, no. 483.

Erlandsson. M., and Markowski, A. (2006). The Effective Exchange Rate Index KIX –

Theory and Practice. Swedish National Institute of Economic Research Working

Paper, no. 95. European Central Bank (2012). The Convergence Report, 2012. Retrieved from

Genorio, H., and Kozarmenik, D. (2004). FEER estimates – the Slovenian case. Prikazi in analize XII/1, Banka Slovenije.

Hinosaar, M., Kaadu, H., and Uskula, L. (2005). Estimating the Equilibrium Exchange Rate of the Estonian Kroon. Working Papers of Eesti Pank, no 2.

International Monetary Fund (2002). Assessing Sustainability. Retrieved from:

International Monetary Fund (2010). Romania-Staff Report for the 2010 Article IV Consultation, Fourth Review under the Stand-By Arrangement, and Requests for Modification and Waiver of Nonobservance of Performance Criteria. Retrieved from:

International Monetary Fund (2012). Romania-Fifth Review under the Stand-By Arrangement, and Requests for Modification and Waiver of Non-observance of Performance Criteria. Retrieved from:

Isărescu, M. (2008). Problems of the Monetary Policy in an Emergent Economy. Romania’s Case. Speech sustained at the Royal Academy of Economic and Financial Sciences.

Isard, P., Faruquee, H., Kincaid, G.R., and Fetherston, M. (2001). Methodology for Current Account and Exchange Rate Assessements. IMF Occasional Paper, no. 209.

Isard, P. (2007). Equilibrium Exchange Rates: Assessement Methodologies. IMF Working Papers, 07/296.

Klau, M., and Fung, S.S. (2006). The new BIS effective exchange rate indices. BIS Quarterly Review, March 2006, 51-65.

Krugman, P.R., and Obstfeld, M. (2006). International Economics. Theory and Policy (7th edition). Boston: Pearson Addison Wesley.

Lee, J., Milesi-Ferretti, G.M., and Ricci, R.A. (2008). Real Exchange Rates and Fundamentals: A Cross-Country Perspective. IMF Working Papers, 08/13.

Komerek, L., and Melecky, M. (2004). The Behavioural Equilibrium Exchange Rate of the Czech Koruna. Czech National Bank Project, A2/04.

Kyriacou, G., and Papageourghiu, M. (2010). Assessing the Equilibrium Exchange Rate of the Cyprus Pound at the time of Euro Adoption. Central Bank of Cyprus Working Paper, 2010-6.

Lazea, V., Anghel, L.C., and Biriş, G. (2012). Prioritizarea politicilor Uniunii Europene prin prisma avantajelor produse de acestea pentru România, în perspectiva participării la negocierile desfășurate în cadrul procesului de revizuire a bugetului comunitar [The Prioritization of the European Union Policies Through the Created Advantages for Romania, in the Perspective of Participating in the Negociations Within the Process of Revising the Communitary Budget]. Bucharest: Economică Publishing House.

Maeso-Fernandez F., Osbat C., and Schatz, B. (2004). Towards the estimation of equilibrium exchange rates for CEE acceding countries: methodological issues and a panel cointegration perspective. ECB Working Paper Series, no. 353.

Mihalcea, A., Vițelar, A., and Anghel, L.C. (2014). For or Against the Eurozone? Romanian Students’ Perspective on the Economic Crisis and Their Future as European Citizens, Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 2(2), 355-375.

Milesi-Ferretti, G.M., and Lane, P.R. (2004). International Investment Patterns. IMF Working Papers, 04/134.

National Bank of Romania (2011). Report upon the Financial Stability. Retrieved from:

National Bank of Romania (2012). Report upon the Financial Stability. Retrieved from:

Obstfeld, M., and Rogoff, K.S. (2000). The Six Major Puzzles in International Macroeconomics: Is There a Common Cause?. NBER Working Paper, no. 7777.

Oomes, N. (2005). Maintaing Competitiveness under Equilibrium Real Appreciation: The Case of Slovakia. IMF Working Papers, 05/65.

Penkova-Pearson, E. (2011). Trade, Convergence and Exchange Rate Regime: Evidence from Bulgaria and Romania. National Bank of Bulgaria Discussion Papers, 85/2011.

Rodriguez, A., Perez-Quiros, G., and Seguera Cayuela, R. (2012). Competitiveness Indicators: the Importance of an Efficient Allocation of Resources. Banco de Espana, Economic Bulletin (January).

Rogoff, K. (1996). The Purchasing Power Parity Puzzle. Journal of Economic Literature, 34(2), 647-668.

Rubaszek, M., and Rawdanowicz, L. (2009). Economic convergence and the fundamental equilibrium exchange rate in central and Eastern Europe. International Review of Financial Analysis, 18(5), 277-284.

Sinca, E., and Anghel, L.C. (2012). Agricultura in Romania [Agriculture in Romania]. Bucharest: BCR.

Sinca, E. (2013). Romania’s Attractivity in the Respect of the Direct Foreign Investments and the Portfolio Investments]. Bucharest: BCR Research.

Schmitz, M., De Clercq, M., Fidora, M., Lauro, B., and Pinheiro, C. (2012). Revisiting the Exchange Rates of the Euro. ECB Occasional Paper, no. 134/ June 2012.

Treapăt, L.M., and Anghel, L.C. (2014). Possible Ways and Means for an Enhanced Partnership between the Finance Resources Owners and Their Local Beneficiaries in Romania, Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 2(3), 510-524.

Turner, P. and Van’t dack, J. (1993). Measuring international price and cost Competitiveness. BIS Economic Papers, no. 39.

Williamson, J. (1994). Estimating Equilibrium Exchange Rates. Washington: Peterson Institute Press: All Books.

Zakaria, M., and Ghauri, A.B. (2011). Trade Openness and Real Exchange Rate: Some Evidence from Pakistan. Romanian Economic Journal, XVI(39), 201-229.

Zumer, T. (2002). Estimation of the Balassa-Samuelson effect in Slovenia. Prikazi in analize, X/1, Banka Slovenije.




How to Cite

ANGHEL, L., & TREAPĂT, L.-M. (2015). Main Economic Policies in order to Manage an Optimum Accession of Romania to the Euro Zone. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 3(1), 151. Retrieved from