Eastern Partnership Integration with the EU and Inclusive Growth of National Economies


  • Eka SEPASHVILI Tbilisi State University


The paper aims at analyzing the circumstances and objectives of the regional integration in the context of global development. The EU is one of the most influential and important actors of the global world, which represents one of the most developed examples of the regional integration. During the development, the EU went through the several stages on enlargement. Even nowadays, without having targeted to the reactive new member in foreseen future, the EU continues the process of integration of adjacent regions by setting goals and priorities through different forms such as the European Neighborhood, the Eastern Partnership, Association Agreements, various types of Trade agreements. The Eastern Partnership which represents the EU’s eastern neighborhood consisting by former soviet republics has steadily gone up with integration: 1. Georgia, Moldova, and Ukraine have already signed the Association Agreement (AA) including Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Areas (DCFTAs) with the EU and now these countries work on further progress in terms of the Implementation of AA/DCFTA; 2. Armenia and Azerbaijan are seeking new framework to up-grade their relationship with the EU, Belarus created EU Belarus Co-ordination Group and acts within the Single Support Framework program for 2017-2020. The evolution of EaP countries’ trade data evidently show the changes and growing dynamics in the region. The obvious increasing tendency of trade volumes predicts for further success in the future after the DC FTAs are enacted fully for some countries and/or other trade facilitation measures are utilized fully for others. A new approach to the economic growth also suggests that benefit from economic growth supports poverty reduction, widely spreads across sectors and affects the majority of the labor force and hence, rise the welfare of the population. In this context, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) appears to be a useful tool to achieve this overwhelming goal. In the difficult business climate prevailing in most of the EaP countries, the role of the EU support could include raising awareness on CSR and supporting the implementation of relevant standards in the enterprises that are benefiting from the EU assistance.


Balassa, B. (1961). The Theory of Economic Integration. Homewood, Illinois: Richard D. Irwin Inc.

European Commission (2015). Review of the European Neighbourhood Policy, joint communication to the European parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the Committee and Regions. Retrieved from http://eeas.europa.eu/archives/docs/enp/documents/ 2015/151118_joint-communication_review-of-the-enp_en.pdf.

European Commission (2016). Shared Vision, Common Action: A Stronger Europe A Global Strategy for the European Union’s Foreign And Security Policy. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/neighbo urhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/eu_global_strategy.pdf.

European Commission (2017a). Joint staff working document, Eastern Partnership - 20 Deliverables for 2020. Focusing on key priorities and tangible results. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/neigh bourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/eap_20_deliverables_for_2020.pdf.

European Commission (2017b). Statistics of Countries and Regions. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu /trade/policy/countries-and-regions/statistics/.

European Council (2009). Joint Declaration of the Prague Eastern Partnership Summit Prague, 7 May 2009. Retrieved from https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/ er/107589.pdf.

European Council (2016). Council conclusions on Belarus. Retrieved from http://www.consilium.europa. eu/en/press/press-releases/2016/02/15-fac-belarus-conclusions/.

European Union. External Action (2004). European Neighbourhood Policy. Retrieved from https://eeas.europa.eu/topics/european-neighbourhood-policy-enp_en.

Gazzola, P., & Querci, E. (2017). The Connection Between the Quality of Life and Sustainable Ecological Development. European Scientific Journal, 13(12), 361-375.

Gazzola, P., Colombo, G., Pezzetti, R., & Nicolescu, L. (2017). Consumer Empowerment in the Digital Economy: Availing Sustainable Purchasing Decisions. Sustainability, 9(5), 693.

Googins, B.K., Philip, H.M., & Steven, A.R. (2007). Beyond "good company": next generation corporate citizenship. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

Leipziger, D., Simmons, B., & Autio, A. (2011). Corporate Social Responsibility and Regional Trade and Investment Agreements. Retrived from http://unep.ch/etb/publications/CSR%20publicati on/UNEP_Corporate%20Social%20Responsibility.pdf.

Liagrovas, P. (2013). Do Business Incubators and Technoparks affect regional development? A comparative study in the EU27 and the NC16 countries. Retrieved from http://www.ub.edu/searchproject/wp-content/ uploads/2013/01/WP-4.5.pdf.

Ruggie, J.G. (1993). Multilateralism Matters: The Theory and Practice of the Institutional Form. New York: Columbia University.

Sepashvili, E. (2013). Georgia’s Economic Integration into European Space: Challenges and Prospects. In Kovářová, E., Melecký, L., & Staníčková, M. (Eds). Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on European Integration (pp.247-254). Ostrava: Technical University of Ostrava

Sepashvili, E. (2014). Political and Economic Aspects of Security policy in Relation to Eastern Partnership- Georgia. Paper presented at the JEAN MONNET CONFERENCE, University of Latvia, Riga, 11-13 June.

Wheeler, D., & Sillanpaa, M. (1997). The Stakeholder Corporation: A Blueprint for Maximising Stakeholder Value. London: Pitman.




How to Cite

SEPASHVILI, E. (2017). Eastern Partnership Integration with the EU and Inclusive Growth of National Economies. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 5(3), 439–454. Retrieved from https://www.managementdynamics.ro/index.php/journal/article/view/225