Toward Preventive Management of Risks Theory: Foundation of Process Structuring the Theory

Safa MAAMIR, Mahfoud DERGHOUM

Abstract


The preventive management of risks in enterprises has a pivotal role in preserving the value created in the business processes. Despite the notable importance of this area of study, it has received little attention from researchers.   A deep investigation and analysis of the literature on risk management led to reveal that there is a need for a solid foundation of preventive management of risks theory. Although the contribution of the previous studies in the area of preventive management of risks, by identifying the pillars that constitute it, and highlighting the contribution of the integration of risk management and knowledge management in preventing risks.  However, we may only consider these studies as preliminary steps in the development of this new field since they did not justify the integration of different disciplines to generate a new one. Moreover, they did not provide any operational process that structures this paradigm. Thus, we aim through the present study to take one further step in the foundation of preventive management of risks and to develop an operational process that regulates this field by coupling a knowledge management process with the process of the integrated management of risks and business processes. This integration has followed a rigorous and strict methodology to justify and accept the integration of two separated fields in one single field as a scientific and valid foundation. This research has succeeded to provide theoretical implications and a conceptual model for preventive management of risks, which triggers the need for empirical implications to improve the outcomes of this study. 


Full Text:

PDF

References


Aldin, L., & De Cesare, S. (2009). A comparative analysis of business process modelling techniques. 14th annual UK association of information systems conference AIS, Oxford university. https://aisel.aisnet.org/ukais2009/2

Bank for International Settlements, Basel Committee on Banking. (2003). Sound Practices for the Management and Supervision of Operational Risk. https://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs96.htm

Becerra-Fernandez, I., & Sabherwal, R. (2010). knowledge management: Systems and processes. M.E Sharpe ,INC.

Becker, J., Rosemann, M., & Von Uthmann, C. (2000). Guidlines of business process modeling. In W. M. Aalst, J. Desel , & A. Oberweis (Eds.), Business Process Management: Models, Techniques, and Empirical Studies (2nd 30-49). Springer-Verlag.

Bhatt, G. D. (2001). Knowledge management in organizations: examining the interaction between technologies , techniques , and people. Journal of Knowledge Management, 5(1), 68-75. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270110384419

BS ISO 31000. (2018). Risk management-Guidelines. https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:31000:en

CIOTLOS, D. Ș. (2020). Knowledge Flows Barriers: An Exploratory Study in the IT Industry. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 8(4), 463-487.

Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). (2004). Enterprise risk management – integrated framework. http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~andrewc/erm2/reading/ERM%20-%20COSO%20Application%20Techniques.pdf

Dalkir , K. (2005). Knowledge management in Theory and Practice. Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann.

Dumas, M., La Rosa, M., Mendling, J., & Reijers, H. (2013). Fundamentals of Buisness Process Managment. Springer-Verlag.

Hammer , M., & Champy , J. (1993). Reengineering the corporation . HaperCollins.

Hammer, M. (2015). What is business process management? In J. Vom Brocke , & M. Rosemann. Editor (Eds.),, Handbook on business process management 1: introduction, methods and information systems. Springer.

ISO/IEC 19510. (2013). Information technology-object management group business process model and notation. Retrieved 5 27, 2020, from https://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/ISO/19510/PDF

ISO/IEC 73. (2009). Risk management–Vocabulary. Geneva. Retrieved 6 20, 2020, from https://ehss.moe.gov.ir/getattachment/73bc1a52-b3c5-410a-bd2d-cce9edd58652/ISO-iec-guide73

Jaakkola, E. (2020). Designing conceptual articles: four approaches. AMS Review, 10, 18-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-020-00161-0

Jeston, J., & Nelis, J. (2014). Business Process Management: Practical Guidlines To Successful Implementation. Routledge.

Kucza, T. (2001). Knowledge management process model. VTT Electronics, technical research center of Finland. http://www.vtt.fi/inf/pdf/publications/2001/P455.pdf

Lamine, E., Thabet , R., Sienou, A., Bork, D., Fontanili , F., & Pingaud, H. (2020). BPRIM: An integrated framework for business process management and risk management. Computer in Industry , Elsevier, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2020.103199

Lee, R. G., & Dalle, B. G. (1998). Busines process management: a review and evaluation. Business process management journal, 4(3), 214-225. https://doi.org/10.1108/14637159810224322

Lin , F.-R., Yang , M.-C., & Pai, Y.-H. (2002). A generic structure for business process modeling. Business Process Management Journal, 8(1), 19-41. https://doi.org/10.1108/14637150210418610

Maclnnis, D. (2011). A framework for conceptual contributions in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 75(4), 136-154. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.75.4.136

Madagh, M., & Chedri Maamar, S. (2017). Les risques humains comme enjeux stratégique: Quelques éLéments de réflexion relatifs aux terrains des organisations et des entreprises. Recherches, 11(2), 27-52. https://www.asjp.cerist.dz/en/article/26641

Neef, D. (2005). Managing corporate risk through better knowledge management . The learning organization: An International Journal, 12(2), 112-124. https://doi.org/10.1108/09696470510583502

Nonaka , I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford university press.

Rosemann, M., & Zur Muehlen, M. (2005). Integrating risks in business process models. Proceedings of the 16th Australian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS 2005)[Conference session]. Australasian chapter of the Association for information systems. https://aisel.aisnet.org/acis2005/50

Rummler, G. A., Ramias, A. J., & Rummler, R. A. (2009). White space revisited: creating value through process. Jossey-Bass.

Sienou, A. (2009). Proposition d'un cadre méthodelogique pour le management intégré des risques et des processus d'entreprise doctoral thesis. Institut National Polytechnique. http://ethesis.inp-toulouse.fr/archive/00000878/

Suriadi , S., Weib, B., Winkelmann, A., Ter Hofstede, A., Adams, M., Conforti, R., . . . Wynn, M. (2014). Current research in risk-aware business process management - overview , comparison and gap analysis. Communication of association for information systems, 34(1), 933-984. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.03452

Tangkawarow, I. R., & Waworuntu, J. (2016). A Comparative of business process modelling techniques. In proceding of IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 128, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/128/1/012010

Valacich, J. S., & George, J. F. (2017). Modern systems analysis and design.Pearson Eduction.

Wetzstein, B., Ma, Z., Filipowska, A., Kaczmarek, M., Bhiri, S., Losada, S., & Cicurel, L. (2007). Semantic Business Process Management: A Lifecycle Based Requirements Analysis. Proceedings of the Workshop (SBPM 2007) in conjunction with the 3rd European Semantic Web Conference ( ESWC 2007), 251. Innsbruck. CEUR-WS.org/Vol-251/

White , S. (2004). Introduction to BPMN . IBM Corporation .

Zur Muehlen, M., & Ho, D. T.-Y. (2005). Risk Management in the BPM lifecycle. International Conference on Business Process Management. 454-466. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/11678564_42


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© Faculty of Management (SNSPA)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under CC BY-NC

The opinions expressed in the papers published are the authors’ own and do not necessarily express the views of the editors of this journal. The authors assume all responsibility for the ideas expressed in the materials published.

ISSN 2392-8042 (online)