A Bibliometric Analysis on Sustainability and Managerial Strategies. Research Trends and Key Insights
Keywords:
sustainability research; green innovation; strategic management; bibliometric analysis; knowledge economyAbstract
The integration of sustainability within managerial strategies has become a pivotal research domain in the Knowledge Economy, reflecting the increasing necessity for organizations to adopt environmentally and socially responsible business models. This study conducts a bibliometric analysis of sustainability research, emphasizing its impact on organizational performance and strategic management. By analyzing scholarly outputs from 2000 onwards, up to present times, this paper maps the evolution of sustainability discourse and identifies key research clusters, thematic trends, and citation networks in the field. Using data extracted from the Scopus database, this study applies bibliometric methodologies, including co-word analysis, citation mapping, and Bradford’s and Lotka’s laws, to trace the intellectual structure of sustainability research. The findings reveal a steady increase in academic contributions, with a notable acceleration in the past decade, indicating the growing relevance of sustainability as a strategic pillar for organizations. Core themes identified include corporate social responsibility, green innovation, stakeholder engagement, and regulatory adaptation. Consequently, this paper contributes to the scientific and managerial discourse by offering a structured synthesis of sustainability research within the Knowledge Economy framework. The results provide insights into theoretical advancements, research gaps, and potential directions for future studies, guiding policymakers, academics, and business leaders in shaping sustainable business strategies. The study also highlights the role of collaborative research networks in fostering innovation and driving sustainable change in disruptive times.References
Adu, D. A., Al‐Najjar, B., & Sitthipongpanich, T. (2022). Executive compensation, environmental performance, and sustainable banking: The moderating effect of governance mechanisms. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(4), 1439–1463. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2963
Alafeshat, R., & Tanova, C. (2019). Servant leadership style and high-performance work system practices: Pathway to a sustainable Jordanian airline industry. Sustainability, 11(22), 6191. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226191
Azizi, L. (2022). Which leadership processes encourage sustainable transitions within universities? International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 24(1), 46–68. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijshe-12-2021-0510
Bell, D. (1973). The coming of postindustrial society. Basic Books.
Biclesanu, I., & Dima, A. M. (2021). Entrepreneurship in the digital and industry 4.0 age: A semi-systematic literature review. Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, 15(1), 505–517. https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2021-0046
Bumbac, R., Bobe, M., Procopie, R., Pamfilie, R., Giușcă, S., & Enache, C. (2020). How zoomers’ eating habits should be considered in shaping the food system for 2030—A case study on the young generation from Romania. Sustainability, 12(18), 7390. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187390
Brătianu, C., García-Pérez, A., Mas, F. D., & Bedford, D. (2024). Knowledge translation. Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/9781803828893
Brundtland, G. H. (1987). Our common future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development (UN Document A/42/427). United Nations. http://www.un-documents.net/ocf-ov.htm
Cantele, S., & Zardini, A. (2018). Is sustainability a competitive advantage for small businesses? An empirical analysis of possible mediators in the sustainability–financial performance relationship. Journal of Cleaner Production, 182, 166–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.016
Castillo-Villar, R. G. (2020). Identifying determinants of CSR implementation on SDG 17 partnerships for the goals. Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), 1847989. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1847989
Chan, K., Lin, S., & Shih, I. (2022). The mediator CSR plays the effective leadership belief role for resource dilemma handling leadership in organizational commitment during sustainability development. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 874646. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.874646
Chen, X., Weerathunga, P., Nurunnabi, M., Kulathunga, K., & Samarathunga, W. (2020). Influences of behavioral intention to engage in environmental accounting practices for corporate sustainability: Managerial perspectives from a developing country. Sustainability, 12(13), 5266. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135266
Cioca, A., Wehbe, K., Popescu, D., & Popescu, C. (2020). The main drivers for sustainable decisions in a family business that impact the company’s performance. Sustainability, 12(20), 8659. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208659
Dobre, F., Ciobanu, G., Creţu, R. F., & Sabie, O. M. (2021, June 3-5). Methodological support for the Romanian sustainable development in a European context [Paper presentation]. 7th BASIQ International Conference “New Trends in Sustainable Business and Consumption”, Foggia, Italy. https://doi.org/10.24818/basiq/2021/07/013
Drucker, P. (1969.) The age of discontinuity: Guidelines to our changing society. Harper & Row.
Elkington, J. (1994). Towards the sustainable corporation: Win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. California Management Review, 36, 90-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/41165746
Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st century business. Oxford.
García‐Marco, T., Zouaghi, F., & Sánchez, M. (2020). Do firms with different levels of environmental regulatory pressure behave differently regarding complementarity among innovation practices? Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(4), 1684–1694. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2461
Hallinger, P., & Suriyankietkaew, S. (2018). Science mapping of the knowledge base on sustainable leadership, 1990–2018. Sustainability, 10(12), 4846. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124846
Hu, L., Chang, T., Lee, Y., Yen, S., & Ting, C. (2023). How does sustainable leadership affect environmental innovation strategy adoption? The mediating role of environmental identity. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(1), 894. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010894
Ille, C. (2022). Does size matter in organizing corporate social responsibility (CSR) in Romanian firms? Oradea Journal of Business and Economics, 7(2), 87–95. https://doi.org/10.47535/1991ojbe159
Kshetri, N. (2007). Chinese technology enterprises in developing countries: Sources of strategic fit and institutional legitimacy. The Rapidly Transforming Chinese High-Technology Industry and Market, 181-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-84334-464-3.50012-X
Lupoae, O. D., Radu, R. I., Isai, V., & Mihai, O. I. (2023). Sustainable entrepreneurship in the equestrian sector through horse manure: A PLS-SEM approach. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 29(7), 1497–1515. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijebr-06-2022-0538
Ma, Y., Lin, T., & Xiao, Q. (2022). The relationship between environmental regulation, green-technology innovation and green total-factor productivity—Evidence from 279 cities in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(23), 16290. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192316290
Machlup, F. (1962). The production and distribution of knowledge in the United States. Princeton University Press.
Malik, S. Y., Cao, Y., Mughal, Y. H., Kundi, G. M., Mughal, M. H., & Ramayah, T. (2020). Pathways towards sustainability in organizations: Empirical evidence on the role of green human resource management practices and green intellectual capital. Sustainability, 12(8), 3228. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083228
Manaswi, K., Singh, A., & Gupta, V. (2023). Building a better future with sustainable investments: Insights from recent research. Indian Journal of Human Development, 17(2), 320–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/09737030231194836
Müller, L. D. O., Kneipp, J. M., Rodrigues, J. P., & Favarin, R. R. (2022). Innovation of impact business models. Journal on Innovation and Sustainability RISUS, 13(2), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.23925/2179-3565.2022v13i2p59-72
Mustapha, N. A., & Hassan, R. (2022). The relationship between organisational efficacy and corporate sustainability in the construction industry. Quantum Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(2), 64–73. https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v3i2.137
Naciti, V., Césaroni, F., & Pulejo, L. (2021). Corporate governance and sustainability: A review of the existing literature. Journal of Management and Governance, 26(1), 55–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-020-09554-6
OECD. (1996). The Knowledge Based Economy. OECD.
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo‑Wilson, E., McDonald, S., McGuinness, L. A., Stewart, L. A., Thomas, J., Tricco, A. C., Welch, V. A., Whiting, P., & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 10, 89. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4
Popescu, D. I., Ceptureanu, E. G., & Ceptureanu, S. I. (2021). Innovative models for approaching managerial practice. Proceedings of the International Management Conference, 15(1), 123–130. https://doi.org/10.24818/imc/2021/03.13
Purcarea, T., Ioan-Franc, V., Ionescu, S. A., Purcărea, I., Purcărea, V. L., Purcarea, I., … & Orzan, A. (2022). Major shifts in sustainable consumer behavior in Romania and retailers’ priorities in agilely adapting to it. Sustainability, 14(3), 1627. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031627
Saleem, A., Ling, W., Aslam, S., & Tian-Xue, Z. (2021). Spotlight on leadership path-goal theory silos in practice to improve and sustain job-oriented development: Evidence from education sector. Sustainability, 13(21), 12324. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132112324
Schulte, J., & Hallstedt, S. I. (2018). Company risk management in light of the sustainability transition. Sustainability, 10(11), 4137. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114137
Shao, S., Hu, Z., Cao, J., Yang, L., & Guan, D. (2020). Environmental regulation and enterprise innovation: A review. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 1465–1478. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2446
Stevenson, A. (Ed.). (2010). Oxford dictionary of English (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Ștefan, D., Vasile, V., Oltean, A., Comes, C., Stefan, A., Ciucan-Rusu, L., … & Timuş, M. (2021). Women entrepreneurship and sustainable business development: Key findings from a SWOT–AHP analysis. Sustainability, 13(9), 5298. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095298
Stiegler, S. (2021). Sustainable digital innovation – preconditions and methods of integrating sustainability aspects into digitalization. European Business & Management, 7(6), 216-222. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ebm.20210706.18
Tan, G. (2021). Assembling sustainability reporting in Singapore. Competition & Change, 26(5), 629–649. https://doi.org/10.1177/10245294211020624
Tawfig, N. F., & Kamarudi, S. (2022). Influence of organizational culture, sustainable competitive advantages, and employees’ commitment on strategic human resources management in the banking sector of Saudi Arabia. Business Management and Strategy, 13(1), 13-33. https://doi.org/10.5296/bms.v13i1.19359
Vaio, A. D., Boccia, F., Landriani, L., & Palladino, R. (2020). Artificial intelligence in the agri-food system: Rethinking sustainable business models in the COVID-19 scenario. Sustainability, 12(12), 4851. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12124851
Vodă, A., Tudor, A. I. M., Chițu, I. B., Dovleac, L., & Brătucu, G. (2021). IoT technologies as instruments for SMEs’ innovation and sustainable growth. Sustainability, 13(11), 6357. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116357
Wei, G. (2018). A bibliometric analysis of the top five economics journals during 2012–2016. Journal of Economic Surveys, 33(1), 25–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12260
Wolf, J. (2014). The relationship between sustainable supply chain management, stakeholder pressure and corporate sustainability performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 119, 317–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1603-0
Zhu, Q., & Sarkis, J. (2007). The moderating effects of institutional pressures on emergent green supply chain practices and performance. International Journal of Production Research, 45(18–19), 4333–4355. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540701440345
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Victor-Emanuel CIUCIUC, Yuriy BILAN, Peter KONHÄUSNER

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) with the condition to attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor. They may not alter, transform, or build upon this work.