The Impact of Facebook on University-Students Relationships


  • Sabina Iustina ȘTEFĂNICĂ National University of Political Studies and Public Administration


The advent of increased competition between higher education institutions (HEI) has resulted in a transformation within the education market. To survive in this internationally competitive and hostile market, HEIs must engage in mutually beneficial relationships with key stakeholders and tailor management practices in line with their vision. Thus there is a symbiotic relationship between the HEI, their stakeholders and the stakeholders’ needs. This article aims to clarify the interests of the primary stakeholder, the Romanian student, by analysing their perception of the Facebook engagement strategies used by Romanian universities. In writing this case study we used a quantitative approach - online questionnaires - distributed to student stakeholders through the official Facebook accounts of the public and private Romanian universities.  The research was restricted to 285 questionnaires; the number of valid questionnaires obtained during the time allocated for data collection. The intrinsic value of the study is its integrative approach to the theories and studies regarding the engagement strategies available to HEIs through social media and the research of a heretofore unexplored area in Romanian literature. The study has three key findings: 1) Students welcome an active official Facebook presence by their University and professors; 2) Students have a direct interest and strongly believe that they will derive benefit from the Facebook publication of academic and administrative information; and 3) Students would be highly supportive and appreciative of informal Facebook interaction.  Finally we recommend further qualitative research to assess the totality of the impact of social media on the university-students relationship.


Alves, H., and Raposo, M. (2006). Conceptual model of student satisfaction in higher education. Total Quality Management, 18(1), 571-588.

Boesso, G., and Kamalesh, K. (2008). An investigation of stakeholder prioritization and engagement: who or what really counts. Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change, 5(1), 62-80.

Castells, M. (1996). The information age: Economy, society and culture: Vol. 1, The rise of the network society. Oxford: Blackwell.

Chatterton, P., and Goddard, J. (2000). The response of higher education institutions to regional needs. European Journal of Education, 35(4), 475-496.

Chelcea, S. (2001). Tehnici de cercetare sociologică [Techniques of sociological research]. Bucharest: SNSPA Publishing.

Clarkson, M.E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 20(1), 92–118.

Dobni, C., and Luffman, G. (2003). Determining the scope and impact of market orientation profiles on strategy implementation and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 24(6), 577-585.

Freeman, R.E. (2010). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Friedman, A.L., and Miles, S. (2006). Stakeholders: Theory and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hennig-Thurau, T., Langer, M., and Hansen, U. (2001). Modelling and managing student loyalty: an approach based on the concept of relationship quality. Journal of Service Research, 3(4), 331-344.

Jahansoozi, J. (2006). Organization-stakeholder relationships: exploring trust and transparency. Journal of Management Development, 25(10), 943.

Jongbloed, B., Enders, J., and Salerno, C. (2008). Higher education and its communities: interconnections, interdependencies in higher education. Looking forward: Themes on the Changing Relationship between Higher Education and Society. European Science Foundation. Retrieved from

Lam, Y., and Pang, S. (2003). The relative effects of environmental, internal and contextual factors on organizational learning: the case of Hong Kong schools under reforms. The Learning Organization, 10(2), 83-97.

Laplume, A.O., Sonpar, K., and Litz, R. A. (2008). Stakeholder theory: Reviewing a theory that moves us. Journal of Management, 34(6), 1152–1189.

Mainardes, E. W., Alves, H., and Raposo, M. (2010). An Exploratory Research on the Stakeholders of a University. Journal of Management and Strategy, 1(1), 76-88.

Merante A.J. (2009). The Digital Frontier: The Implications of Evolving Technology on Strategic Enrollment Management. Retrieved from

Miles, S. (2011). Stakeholder: Essentially Contested or Just Confused. Journal of Business Ethics. DOI 10.1007/s10551-011-1090-8.

Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B.R., and Wood, D.J. (1997). Towards a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.

Munteanu, R., and Popescu, S. (2008). Analiza diagnostic “Universitățile și mediul socio-economic. Proiecte strategice pentru Învățământul Superior” [The diagnosis analysis “Universities and the socio-economic environment. Strategic projects for Higher Education”]. Retrieved from

Pînzaru, F., and Mitan, A. (2013). Generation Y Students: Using Facebook for Communicating with University Staff and Professors. Management Dynamics in a Knowledge Economy, 1(2), 233-236.

Shavit, Y., and Blossfeld, H.-P. (Eds.) (1993). Persistent inequality: Changing educational attainment in thirteen countries. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Teichler, U. (1999). Internationalisation as a Challenge for Higher Education in Europe. Tertiary Education and Management, 5(1), 5-22.

Vătămănescu, E.-M. (2012). Similaritatea în cadrul comunităților virtuale [Similarity in virtual communities]. Bucharest: Universitară Publishing.

Romania Facebook Statistics (2013). Retrieved from

U.S. State Department Social Media Landscape: Romania. (2011). Retrieved from

Yearly Education Report (2011). Retrieved from




How to Cite

ȘTEFĂNICĂ, S. I. (2014). The Impact of Facebook on University-Students Relationships. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 2(3), 492. Retrieved from