Market Positioning of Public and Private Universities: Students Perspective

Abdul-Kahar ADAM, Mohammed Abdulai MAHMOUD


This paper concentrates on universities strategies for admitting students and the rate at which private sector universities expand in today’s higher educational setups. This paper answers the following question: to what extend are the public universities different from the private universities? In an attempt to find the answers, the whole study is developed
towards students’ perception of the universities positioning in terms of what they are offering to the customers, through what they prompt people to apply for admission? Therefore, this
paper looks at the prevailing admission strategies and potential students’ entry requirements at both public and private universities to determine the theoretical systems that are used by these universities in competition for customers (students). A quantitative survey of students in both public and private universities in Ghana was undergone In all, a total number of 255 questionnaires were printed. Only 187 were answered and returned out of 200 distributed questionnaires to the public sector universities whereas 55 questionnaires were distributed to the private sector students and 51 were answered and returned. This research was based on sampling data collection methods. The findings show that there are three categories of universities such as Publicly/Fully Independent Chartered Universities, Privately Owned Universities and Personal/Sole Proprietorship University Colleges. All these affect students’ choices for admission application. The findings clearly indicate that both public and private universities
purposes are related using Pearson’s Product Moment Correlation Coefficient formulae to that of the sole proprietorship colleges. Also, the admission requirement strategies differ between public and private universities.

Full Text:



Canterbury, R.M. (1999), “Higher education marketing: a challenge”, The Journal of College Admission, Vol. 165, pp. 22-30.

Coates, D. (1998), “Marketing of further and higher education: an equal opportunities perspective”, Journal of Further and Higher Education, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 135-42.

Cubillo, J., Sanchez, J. and Cervino, J. (2006), “International students’ decision-making process”, International Journal of Educational Management, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 101-15.

Goran Svensson and Greg Wood (2007), International Journal of Educational Management, vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 17-28

Ivy, J. (2001), “Higher education institution image: a correspondence analysis approach”, The International Journal of Educational Management, Vol. 15 Nos 6/7, pp. 276-82.

Jonathan Ivy (2008), International Journal of Educational Management, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 288-299

Keith, R.J. (1960), “The marketing revolution”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 24, pp. 35-8.

Kotler, P. (2000), Marketing Management – The Millennium Edition, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

Little, M.W., O’Toole, D.O. and Wetzel, J. (1997), “The price differential’s impact on retention, recruitment, and quality in a public university”, Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 37-51.

MacGregor, K. (2000), “Dire results slash numbers”, The Times Higher Education Supplement, 28 January, p. 15.

MacGregor, K. (2000), “Dire results slash numbers”, The Times Higher Education Supplement, 28 January, p. 15.

Merten, M. (2000), “Tertiary education disaster looms”, Mail and Guardian, 7-13 April, p. 3.

McKitterick, J.B. (1957), “What is the marketing management concept?”, in Bass, F. (Ed.), Frontiers of Marketing Thought and Action, American Marketing Association, Chicago, IL, pp. 71-82.

Nicholls, J., Harris, J., Morgan, E., Clarke, K. and Sims, D. (1995), “Marketing higher education: the MBA experience”, International Journal of Educational Management, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 31-8.

Ratshinga, M.T. (1998), “Higher fees make for few students”, available at: wmail/issues/980313/news36.html (accessed 7 July 2001).

Taylor, R.E. and Darling, J.R. (1991), “Perceptions towards marketing higher education: do academic disciplines make a difference?”, in Hayes, T.J. (Ed.), New Strategies in Higher Education Marketing, Haworth Press, New York, NY, pp. 17-38.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c)

© Faculty of Management (SNSPA)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under CC BY-NC

The opinions expressed in the papers published are the authors’ own and do not necessarily express the views of the editors of this journal. The authors assume all responsibility for the ideas expressed in the materials published.

ISSN 2392-8042 (online)